From the Passenger's Perspective: 2013 Chrysler 300

It is slightly unusual for me to be testing a big, American sedan such as the Chrysler 300.  This is actually our rental car for a vacation/business trip to the Big Island of Hawaii.  A Cadillac CTS was the original option, but the 300 ended up being the car for the job.

Exterior Looks
The Chrysler 300, unusual for cars of this type, looks very good.  I love the aggressive yet restrained look of the grille/headlights combo, and the intimidating stance.  It looks very gangster-esque.  I imagine Al Capone would drive this if he were to stalk the streets of Chicago today.  It compels you to drive it with just your left hand on the top of the wheel.  The Cadillac Escalade does the same.


Interior Looks/Functionality
I will start this section of by saying the 300's interior does not stack up to some of it's German rivals.  However, it is cheaper, with a starting MSRP of around $30,000.  It doesn't have quite the same quality or gadgets as it's competitors.  However, for the money, you do get a fairly nice place to be.  The plastics are a bit scratchy, but I love the seats, and the 8.4-inch touchscreen system works surprisingly well.  It took a few minutes to get familiarized with the system, but is very easy and simple to use.  It is also the first car I've been in with an analogue clock.  I thought it would look a bit cheesy and overdone, but it looks nice. However, the headlights are very strange, as the high-beams would only come on if you held the little lever down. Another minor issue would be the gear selector.  It is too sensitive, and the space in between the P,R,N and D are so small you almost always end up going to far or too little.  The interior could also do with a sat-nav, which is an optional extra.



Comfort
For a big car like this, you kind of expect a lazy, sloppy ride.  But with the Chrysler, you don't get it.  It was fairly comfortable, the driving position is good, and the rear seats have adequate leg room.  The ride is a bit bouncier than say a Mercedes C-Class, but for the price this is a comfortable car.  I did note that the ride in the back is a bit jigglier than in the front.

Driving Dynamics
This isn't a sports car.  Nor is this base version a muscle car.  The steering is a bit vague, and the front wheels are a tad disconnected.  But as far as the engine goes, perfect.  It offers adequate power with minimal fuss.  The steering may not be as good as say a BMW, but again, you have to consider price.

Who is this car for?
I have just introduced this little section, which describes what kind of person I think fits this car best.  The Chrysler is tough.  I'm tempted to say it's good for a middle-aged dad who likes to ferry his kids around in an big, tough, muscle car.  But the 300 is more than that.  I think it works for two people.  The aforementioned cool dad, and I think a retired person who loves big, luxurious American cars with looks and a good engine.

Update
Over the course of the trip, I have learned more about certain aspects of the 300.  For instance, the gear selector is really an issue, it is far too sensitive, you almost always end up going past the gear you are looking for.  Second, it makes a very irritating noise when you reverse, like a ghost howling.  Finally, I have noticed something about the interior plastics.  In the passenger seat, where my knee hits the center console, the black plastics have started to wear and become gray-ish.  Further investigation reveals that if you so much as scrape your knuckle against the plastic, it leaves a white streak on the plastic.  This may be fixed by simply wiping down the plastic, but I'm not so sure.  This could leave the car looking very worn very quickly, considering this particular 300 only has 13,500 miles on the clock.

Conclusion
When I first got in the Chrysler, I didn't think I'd like it.  I usually like little European cars with complicated interiors and great handling.  But the 300 surprised me.  I love it's looks, presence, touchscreen system and the general feeling that you are in a big, intimidating car.  This isn't even the full-bore V8 300S, but even so, it's a great car.

From the Passenger's Perspective: Winter 2013 4X4 Comparison

In anticipation of the upcoming winter, I decided to do my first comparison test, between a few 4X4s.  Many thanks to Geneva Foreign & Sports in Geneva, NY for letting me in the cars for the test.  Here are the cars and some of the stats:

2006 BMW X3 3.01
AWD Six-Speed Auto
225 HP 3.0L I6
15/23 MPG

2009 Jeep Patriot Limited
4WD Five-Speed Auto
172 HP 2.4L I4
23/28 MPG

2006 Subaru Forester 2.5 X Premium
AWD Five-Speed Manual
173 HP 2.5L Boxer-4
23/28 MPG

2007 Volvo XC70 Wagon
AWD Five-Speed Auto
208 HP 2.5L I5 Turbo
19/26 MPG

So those are the contenders, let's get to it

Looks
None of these cars are what you would call striking on the outside, and of course, that isn't what they are about.  Nonetheless, of the four I think the BMW looks the best, a combo of the kidney grille and the sportier-than-the-rest stance.  The Subaru comes a distant second with the Volvo clinching third, and the Patriot coming in fourth.
On the inside, things are very similar as far as aesthetic appeal. Take note this has nothing to do with the functionality of the interior.  I think the BMW also has the best looking interior, a combination of modern German tech and a nice color arrangement.  The Volvo comes second with a slightly-sleek but still very logical and Swedish design.  The Subaru gets third, with a nice simple metallic feel, though the upholstery looks a bit 1990s.  The Jeep again gets fourth, only because everything seems miles away from where you are sitting.  You'd have to be at least 6' 2" to reach the rear-view mirror.



















Interior Quality
With big 4X4s like these, you expect all of them to be made to withstand abuse and harsh climates.  This segment deals with the quality and functionality of the interiors of the contenders.
I would have expected the X3 to again win the segment, but I am actually going to award first place to the Volvo XC70.  It seemed to be the best interior as far as the way it was screwed together, and the layout was nice and logical.  You could almost hear Spock telling the Volvo engineers what to do. It had everything you would need, and nothing you could do without.
The BMW comes a close second.  It was overall a better place to sit in than the Volvo, but in layout and control functionality, it received some demerits.  The main issue was finding buttons.  It took a few minutes to figure out how to unlock the car, until finding out that the unlock button was where the hazard light button was.
Third and fourth are more difficult.  I liked the simple, utilitarian feel in the Subaru, but the Jeep had more actual things in it.  Overall I'd say the Subaru clinches third just because in the Jeep, you can never find anything because everything is laid out so oddly.










































Driving Dynamics
Again, none of these cars are meant for pure driving feel, but it is still important.  BMW has always been great at making cars handle well, and the X3 is no exception.  It has often been praised for feeling like a car to drive, and that the X3 does.  It takes a little while to get yourself accustomed to the heavy steering (or so I've been told), but when you do, the car feels like it has grip.  The X3 feels solid, and, to an extent, you can feel the road through your fingertips.   The BMW also has the most power, and you can tell.  It sounds the best, too.
In second comes the Volvo. It may not handle as well as the BMW, but it still goes around corners with some confidence.  The steering is perfectly weighted, and the power feels just right.  The five-cylinder turbo in the Volvo doesn't feel as refined as the engine in the BMW, but the turbo kicks in and you get sufficient power to startle the kids in the back.
Again, in third place comes the Forester.  It was the only manual we drove, and the gearbox was just too clunky, and it really strained the engine.  As for the handling, well the Subaru is a box on wheels, so it handles like one.
And in fourth comes the Jeep Patriot.  It lacked in the handling department.  You feel as though you have no control over the front wheels.  However, the engine didn't feel as though it lacked power, it was just too harsh in delivery.

Comfort
Now, these cars are for the school run, so they should be comfortable.  In first place comes the Volvo XC70.  My only problem was the slightly unsupportive seats, but other than that, it was spot on.  The suspension absorbed the bumps, and you could just sink into the interior and feel as though you aren't really in a car.
In second place comes the BMW X3.  It has a slightly sportier suspension set up, so of course it will lose its ride comfort somewhat.  However, the seats were perfect and there was almost no noise.
In third again comes the Subaru Forester.  The ride quality was decent, but the engine noise was a bit much and the seats were a bit itchy.
In fourth again was the Jeep Patriot.  The ride was iffy, it was a bit too bouncy.  The body rolled a ton and the engine made a significant amount of noise.

Spaciousness
The primary purpose of these cars is space, that's why you buy them.  The winner of this category is again the Volvo, which impressed me with its huge trunk space, made twice as large by folding the rear seats down.  Volvo has always been good at spacious wagons, and the XC70 is no exception.
In second is the X3.  Despite it's sporty look it has very spacious rear seat area, and decent trunk space.
In third comes the Jeep Patriot.  It had decent space in the back and the trunk was pretty good as well.. However, it was a bit difficult to get the rear seats down.
The Forester got fourth, only because it is much smaller than the other three.  For its size however, it is very spacious indeed.

Conclusion
In conclusion, all these cars could be justified.  However, overall in first place is the Volvo XC70.  I loved it's logical interior layout, the comfort of it's ride and the incredibly spacious trunk.  Perfect for the mom with some children to ferry to and from school/sports etc.
Second place goes to the BMW X3, with it's excellent interior and great car-like driving experience.  Not so much a journey car, but an epic urban taxi.
Third is the Subaru Forester.  It would be the ideal car for somebody who needs a small, cheap, utilitarian workhorse.
And in fourth is the Jeep Patriot (Again).  However, if you are somebody who just needs a car that should be able to do some off-roading, this is your car.
Those are the standings, but I will say the car I would buy with my own money would be the BMW X3.  It wasn't quite good enough to win the test, but it wins my vote.

Note: All these cars are currently available on www.gfs1.com in Geneva, New York, all for under $18,000.

Top 10 Iconic 1990s Cars

These are in no particular order, but here are what I think are the most iconic 90s cars.

1.Mclaren F1-This was the fastest car in the world until the Bugatti Veyron came along.  I especially like the fact that the driver sits in the middle.  It not only means you feel like a racing driver, but it means you can get two passengers in what is technically a two-seater car.



2. Jaguar XJ220-It was a complete failure.  Simple as that.  But it still showed the world what Jaguar was capable of, regardless of it's pitiful sales figures.  And I still think it looks really, really cool.


3. Nissan Skyline-This is my favorite Japanese sports car, and it pretty much led the invasion of the Japanese sports car on the Western world in the 1990s.  It also led us to the current Nissan GT-R, which is important.



4. Nissan 300ZX-This was really the last true Nissan Z-Car.  Some will argue that the current 350Z and the 370Z are Z-cars, but they don't quite adhere to the same recipe set by the 240Z in the 70s.



5.Pagani Zonda C12- This was the first in a long line of brilliant cars.  This car was the first Zonda.  It started one of the few supercar startup manufacturers who actually made it in the world.  And would you just look at it?



6.Ferrari F50- The F50 was made to honor the man who started it all, Mr. Enzo Ferrari.  Some will tell you that it doesn't live up to the name.  I tend to agree.  However, it is still one of the best supercars for pure driving feel and connectivity, even though you are also directly connected to the engine through a 1/4 inch piece of sheet metal.



7.Toyota Supra- Again, it was one of the headliners in the Japanese sports car scene, and it was and still is a car that is great for tuners.



8.BMW M3/M5- Though the M3/M5 started in the 80s with the brilliant original M Cars, along with the M1, the 1990s models really got the ball rolling and continued the bloodline of the best super sedans in the world.



9.Mercury Sable-  You have just looked at that and thought, "what?!", but this is a list of the most iconic cars of the 90s.  And most people will say you can't have 90s cars without some pretty boring cars.  So these last two satisfy that quota.  The Sable was.....um....fill in the blank there I cannot say these things on the Internet.



10.Ford Mustang/Chevrolet Camaro-This may anger some Mustang and Camaro enthusiasts, but the 90s were terrible decades for these two muscle cars.  And in the case of the 'Stang, the 80s as well. They were both underpowered, had prehistoric suspension setups and were incredibly dull to look at.